CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR TAX & FINANCIAL PROFESSIONALS

ASC 832: What CPAs Need to Know About Government Grant Accounting Rules

Western CPE Staff

For years, U.S. GAAP had no dedicated framework for how a business entity should handle a government grant on its financial statements. Practitioners cobbled together approaches from international standards, contingency guidance, and not-for-profit revenue recognition rules. In December of 2025, FASB addressed the gap by issuing ASU 2025-10, which added recognition, measurement, and presentation guidance to ASC 832. If your clients receive government funding in any form, this standard changes how you approach the accounting.

What Counts as a Government Grant

Under the FASB framework, a government grant involves a transfer of cash or a tangible physical asset from a governmental body to a business that is made outside of an exchange transaction. This covers grants from all levels of government, not just federal agencies. Transfers of services, intangible assets like licenses or environmental credits, below-market-rate loans, government guarantees, and anything already covered by income tax guidance are all excluded. So are true exchange transactions, even if the pricing is favorable. The label on the funding, whether it’s a grant, subsidy, or an award, doesn’t determine the accounting. What matters is whether the government is transferring resources without receiving equal value in return and whether the entity must meet specific conditions to receive or keep the funding.

Two Grant Types

Once you’ve confirmed a grant qualifies, the next step is classification. The standard defines two categories:

Grant related to an asset. An asset-related grant is conditioned on the purchase, construction, or acquisition of a specific asset.
Grant related to income. An income-related grant covers everything else. An example of this is funding that reimburses a business for operating expenses such as payroll, utilities, or research costs.

The category drives how the grant is recognized, where it appears on financial statements, and how it interacts with depreciation, expense timing, and potential repayment obligations. When a single grant package includes components of both types, the entity needs to evaluate each portion separately, using judgment about the purpose, amount, and conditions attached to each piece.

Timing Matters

One of the most significant aspects of the guidance is the recognition threshold. Simply receiving government funds doesn’t mean the grant can be recorded. An entity can only recognize a grant when it is probable that the business will satisfy the conditions attached to the grant and that the funding will be received. Those conditions can include using funds for a designated purpose, acquiring a specific type of asset, maintaining operations in a certain location, or meeting ongoing compliance and reporting obligations.

Recognition is generally tied to the period in which the entity incurs the costs the grant is meant to offset, not when the cash arrives. Companies may need to hold received funds as a liability until the recognition criteria are met, or record a receivable when costs are incurred but cash hasn’t yet been received. This is a meaningful shift for entities that were previously recording grant income at the point of receipt.

When is Adoption Coming?

For public companies, the new standard takes effect for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2028. Non-public entities get an extra year. Early adoption is available for any period where financial statements haven’t yet been issued. The FASB requires following one of three transition approaches:

Modified Prospective

This method applies to government grants entered into on or after the effective date, as well as any grants that aren’t yet complete as of that date. A grant is considered complete once substantially all of the grant proceeds have been recognized. Under this approach, there’s no restatement of prior-period results and no cumulative-effect adjustment.

Modified Prospective

This method covers grants entered into on or after the beginning of the earliest period presented and any grants that aren’t complete as of that same date. Prior-period results are restated for those incomplete grants, and a cumulative-effect adjustment is recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.

Modified Prospective

This applies to all government grants and requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the earliest period presented.

Go Deeper on Government Grant Accounting

This overview only scratches the surface of ASC 832. The recognition criteria, the two accounting approaches for asset-related grants, repayment rules, financial statement presentation options, disclosure requirements, and the relationship between ASC 832 and IAS 20 all involve nuances that matter when you’re advising clients or preparing financial statements.

Our government grant accounting courses, by Kelen Camehl, CPA, MBA, walk through every stage of the government grant lifecycle in detail:

Accounting for Receipt of Government Grants – What CPAs Need to Know — A comprehensive 2-credit deep dive into ASC 832, from initial identification through recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure, with case studies and practical examples throughout.
Quick Guide to Accounting for the Receipt of Government Grants — A 1-credit overview for practitioners who need to get up to speed on the essentials efficiently.