CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR TAX & FINANCIAL PROFESSIONALS

Tax Byte

In Thomas W. Langlois v. Comm., the court addressed inadequate substantiation of partnership basis and business expenses. This case is yet another cautionary tale for practitioners advising clients about the importance of adequate recordkeeping, especially those clients with multiple business interests and those who regularly make out-of-pocket expenditures for their partnerships.

Langlois and Partnerships

Langlois was a union power line worker, earning $195,264 in wages in 2015. Beyond his primary employment, he held two partnership interests, a 49% interest in Forbearance (a power line and landscaping company) and a 49% interest in Hair Station (a hair salon).

On his 2015 tax return, Langlois claimed significant partnership losses: $58,381 for Forbearance and $26,583 for Hair Station. The IRS disallowed these losses entirely, citing his failure to establish sufficient basis in either partnership—a prerequisite for deducting partnership losses under §704(d).

ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW

Examining Partnership Losses

A taxpayer bears the burden of proving entitlement to claimed deductions. Taxpayers must maintain sufficient records to substantiate deductions, establishing the nature, amount, and purpose of each expense.

For partnership losses, §704(d) limits a partner’s deduction to the adjusted basis of their partnership interest at year-end. A partner’s basis increases through distributive shares of income and contributions to the partnership (§§705(a)(1), 722), as well as increases in partnership liabilities (§752). Basis decreases by distributive shares of losses, nondeductible expenses, and distributions (§§705(a)(2), 733).

Tax Court Ruled Against Langlois

  • For partnership losses, Langlois couldn’t establish his adjusted basis in either partnership, providing receipts that failed to demonstrate personal payment of partnership expenses, which he treated as capital contributions.
  • For Hair Station, Langlois incorrectly claimed Forms 1099-MISC payments to contractors as his capital contributions, when these payments were made by the partnership itself.
  • The court sustained the 20% accuracy-related penalty (substantial understatement), as the $27,820 understatement exceeded both 10% of the correct tax and $5,000.

Tax Practitioner Planning

Tax practitioners should advise clients to implement regular basis tracking protocols, including records that clearly trace the flow of funds from personal accounts to business entities. Consider developing checklists for clients to follow when making business expenditures, ensuring they maintain proper substantiation contemporaneously rather than attempting reconstruction during an audit. Be sure to educate clients about the importance of maintaining separate financial identities for each business interest. There is danger in commingling personal and business expenses without proper documentation – even legitimate deductions will be disallowed without the paper trail to support them.

  1. Partnership basis tracking is essential: Maintain comprehensive records of all partnership contributions, including initial capital, subsequent contributions, and payment of partnership expenses with personal funds.
  2. Proper contribution documentation: Ensure contributions are clearly documented as coming from the partner personally, not from the partnership or third parties.
  3. Business purpose evidence matters: Keep contemporaneous records demonstrating the business purpose of each expenditure claimed as a contribution or business expense.

Recent Stories

Next Up...

Interested in the IRS's Annual Filing Season Program (AFSP)? We'll break down everything you need
5 min read
What is CPE in Accounting? We've got the answer. Learn everything you need to know
6 min read
The One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act did not extend ACA premium subsides, meaning clients purchasing
3 min read