Guest Post: A Friendlier FASB for Smaller Private Companies?


Article at a Glance:

  • Accountants’ common complaint is an overload of standards
  • Amid the COVID environment, FASB moves to provide relief to smaller private companies
  • Extensions were approved for private companies to reduce the gap between public and private reporting
  • Revenue Recognition, Lease Accounting and Accounting for Credit Losses: A one-year extension was approved to continue using “old standards”
  • CPAs can concentrate on survival and leave the challenges of the new standards to next year

Private Companies Struggling with an Overload of Standards

When we offer our Accounting Update courses, the most common complaint from those working with closely held businesses is standards overload – both the volume and complexity. Both preparers and their external accountants often struggle with standards involving concepts such as fair value that are difficult to implement and generate information that is often of little importance to management, owners, or the banks with whom they deal. This article explains how, as COVID-19 moved front and center, Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) stepped up to provide relief for smaller, private entities. Today, the gap between public and private reporting is more massive than ever.

FASB offers Extensions for New Standard Implementation 

FASB showed some awareness of these issues when encouraged by the Private Company Council, and they began allowing an extra year’s delay for implementation of new standards for private companies. They acknowledged that the difficulties of transitioning to new standards are magnified for smaller entities with typically limited accounting staff and specialist expertise. In 2019 they extended this to two years. It was voluntary, however, allowing those who wished to move faster to do so.

Of course, drawing lines in the sand to separate who’s in and who’s out is notoriously difficult. There is no definition of a private company in GAAP. At the margin, there are questions concerning not-for-profits, employee benefit plans, private companies with public debt, and conduit bond obligors. In 99% of the cases, we know which side of the street we live, and common sense typically prevails. It can get tricky, however, like for the CFO we talked to who had been involved in months of discussion with SEC and FASB and had still been unable to get a definitive answer on one narrow issue.

Revenue Recognition, Lease Accounting, and Accounting for Credit Losses

Smaller companies have been facing the ‘triple threat’ of standards, which would change accounting beyond recognition – Revenue Recognition, Lease Accounting, and Accounting for Credit Losses. Public companies have already adopted the first two of these standards, but considering the challenges of COVID-19, FASB moved remarkably fast earlier this year to provide relief. The lease standard will be now effective for fiscal years beginning after 12/15/2021 (basically calendar year 2022). In an even more surprising last-minute move, ASU 2020-05 indicated that private companies who had not issued their statements by June 3, 2020, could defer adopting the revenue standard (ASC 606) until reporting periods beginning after 12/15/2019 – a year’s further extension. So, companies struggling to get their 2019 financials completed amid the chaos of business closings can continue with the “old” standard. How many companies will do this is anyone’s guess. We would love to hear from any of you who are considering this option. Indeed, if your fiscal year ended 6/30/20 or 9/30/20, the advantages seem clear.

But what about CECL? 

The Board’s controversial approach to credit and losses (a.k.a. bad debts). There have been all sorts of opposition to this standard from banking organizations, and FASB had already provided delays through 2023 for privately held banks and credit unions. In what was essentially an end-run around FASB, Congress, via the CARES Act, delayed implementation – inviting the ire of FASB’s parent organization. They cautioned against interference in what is meant to be an independent standard-setting process. Please see Rod Redding’s excellent article on this page for more details.

So, for now, CPAs who work with closely held businesses can concentrate on survival and leave the challenges of the new standards for another day – or year to be more precise! 

Financial Reporting and Accounting Update in Trouble Times

Accountants in public practice, controllers, and finance professionals who need to steer through the challenges of restoring their business to sound financial health in the wake of COVID-19 will benefit from taking this course.

  • Instructor: Ray Thompson, CBA, CFM, CMA
  • Credits: 6
  • NASBA Category:  Taxes 

Complete Hands-On Guide To The New Revenue Recognition Rules

The new rules replace nearly all of the current GAAP and IFRS guidance and require significant accounting judgment regarding necessary changes to accounting processes and systems.

  • Instructor: Ray Thompson, CBA, CFM, CMA & Bill Engelbert, CPA, Ph.D
  • Credits: 4
  • NASBA Category:  Accounting


William G. Engelbret is an Associate Professor of Accounting at Penn State Altoona, where he has taught for three decades. Recently, Dr. Engelbret served as the Head of the Division of Business and Engineering at Penn State Altoona for nine years. He holds a B.A. in Accounting from Thiel College, an M.B.A. from the University of Pittsburgh, and a Ph.D. in Accounting from the Pennsylvania State University. He is a licensed CPA. He has received numerous teaching awards from Penn State including the prestigious George W. Atherton Award for Excellence in Teaching He has published a number of articles, a book, and a television series. Bill is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA).

View Author Page

Dr. Ray Thompson, CBA, CFM, CMA, is an emeritus associate professor of accounting and finance at the University of Pittsburgh. He served as department head at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown (UPJ) campus for over 25 years. He was the associate director of UPJ’s Entrepreneurial Development Assistance Project, where he was involved in financial consulting and assisting in preparing loan proposals for small business start-ups. He has taught in graduate and undergraduate business programs in Europe, Africa, and the United States.

Ray received his BS and MS degrees in economics and systems dynamics from the University of Bradford in the United Kingdom, his MBA in accounting from Xavier University in Ohio, and his PhD in business administration from Nova University. Ray is also certified in financial management and is a certified management accountant (CMA), a certified business appraiser (CBA), and holds the accredited valuation analyst credential from the National Association of Certified Valuators and Analysts (NACVA). He recently became certified in IFRS though the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

Ray teaches at Western CPE conferences and produces both self-study and webcast courses as well. He also authors and conducts professional development seminars for Fortune 500 and international corporations, multinational financial institutions, state CPA societies, and CPA firms throughout the United States. In addition, Ray provides business valuation services and consults with accounting firms and sole practitioners on a range of accounting issues in the area of valuation. He’s a faculty associate member of the AICPA and the Pennsylvania Institute of Certified Public Accountants (PICPA) and a member of the Financial Reporting Faculty of ICAEW.

View Author Page


How The $3.5 Trillion Budget Blueprint Could Impact Your Clients

The new reporting requirements on brokers are addressed in Section 80603 of the bill. “Broker,” by definition in Sec. 6045 (c)(1), is expanded to include “any other person who (for a consideration) regularly acts as a middleman with respect to property or services…A person shall not be treated as a broker with respect to activities consisting of managing a farm on behalf of another person.” In turn, the bill defines a “digital asset” as “any digital representation of value which is recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger or any similar technology as specified by the Secretary.