New “Mansion Tax” Soon to Impact L.A.

THE BACKSTORY: The midterm elections weren’t only about the control of the House of Representatives and the Senate. In the City of Los Angeles, homelessness was on the ballot. Overcome with the growing numbers of people living on the streets, Los Angeles City voters backed a measure to fund affordable housing and tenant assistance programs.

WHY IT MATTERS: The new programs will be funded through an additional one-time tax on sales and transfers of real property exceeding certain thresholds.

Starting April 1, 2023, the tax rate on such sales and transfers will be:

  • 4% of the consideration or value when the property transferred exceeds $5 million but is less than $10 million, and
  • 5% when the property transferred is $10 million or more.

These thresholds will be adjusted to inflation. Currently, a $5 million sale would be subject to a $200,000 city tax, and a $10 million sale would be subject to a $550,000 city tax.

IN THE CROSSHAIRS: Homelessness and Housing Solutions Tax

The Homelessness and Housing Solutions Tax, although commonly referred to as the “mansion tax”, is not limited to single family homes. The sale of multifamily properties and commercial buildings will be subject to the tax. And it is not just sales, but also the value of property disposed of in a tax deferred exchange that would be subject to the tax.

Long story short – the so-called mansion tax will drive a dramatic increase in the transfer taxes applicable to both residential and commercial property sales in the city of Los Angeles. That said, what related affects might the new tax have? We’re glad you asked. And if you didn’t, we’re going to tell you anyway. Keep in mind the following:

  • Sellers will be incentivized to sell such property before April 1 to avoid the city tax.
  • Inventory of high-end properties will likely climb, perhaps resulting in a buyer’s market. After the effective date, sellers will net the same if they sell for $5.2 million or $4,999,000.
  • Developers are going to look for other luxury communities to avoid a tax that could cost the developer a big chunk of their profit.
  • And, most critical – what other cities in California will fund their efforts to address homelessness and affordable housing with a similar city (or county) tax?

DIVE DEEPER: Documentary Transfer vs Mansion Tax

It is important to note that the new tax would be on top of the existing documentary transfer tax imposed on property sales in the city of Los Angeles, which is at a combined city and county rate of 0.56%. And while the current documentary transfer tax is calculated by excluding the value or liens or encumbrances on the property at the time of sale, the new mansion tax appears to be imposed on the gross value of the property, which would include the value of such liens and encumbrances. And although certain exceptions do apply to the new tax, what remains unclear at this time, however, is whether the separate exceptions under the California state transfer tax statute regarding foreclosures, for example, would be applicable to the new tax.

Although uncertainties on the new tax remain, we are likely to see applicable rules clarifying or perhaps even limiting the tax in the near future. Under Measure ULA, the ordinance containing the tax, the “Director of Finance is authorized and empowered, consistent with applicable law and the purposes of this article, to issue any rules and regulations reasonably necessary to enforce and administer this article, including but not limited to regulations further defining the term “realty sold” in Section 21.9.2 of this article and establishing procedures for administering exemptions to the tax imposed under this article.” 

In other words, stay tuned.


As Western CPE’s VP of Tax Policy and Strategic Partnerships, Jessica keeps her finger on the pulse of Congress and the IRS. She has an extensive background in analyzing and writing on issues related to federal tax policy and IRS administration and has regularly attended congressional hearings and markups on Capitol Hill, as well as public hearings at IRS headquarters. Jessica’s legislative and regulatory procedural knowledge, coupled with her tax law expertise, make her well-versed in the complex worlds of tax policy and administration.

Before her years analyzing tax law with Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting (CCH) and Bloomberg BNA, Jessica represented taxpayers in a wide range of matters before the IRS. Immediately prior to joining Western CPE, Jessica was the acting CEO and managing director of public policy of a national organization for accountants where she was instrumental in leading the organization’s nonpartisan policy agendas, education, and advocacy efforts.

Jessica holds a J.D., cum laude, from the University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law and a B.S. from the University of Maryland, College Park.

View Author Page

Sharon Kreider, CPA, has helped more than 15,000 California tax preparers annually get ready for tax season. She also presents regularly for the AICPA, the California Society of Enrolled Agents, CCH Audio, and Western CPE. You’ll benefit from the detailed, hands-on tax knowledge Sharon will share with you—knowledge she gained through her extremely busy, high-income tax practice in Silicon Valley. With her dynamic presentation style, Sharon will demystify complex individual and business tax legislation. She’s a national lecturer for business and professional groups and consistently receives outstanding evaluations. In 2014, she was awarded the prestigious AICPA 2014 Sidney Kess Award for Excellence in Continuing Education.

View Author Page


How The $3.5 Trillion Budget Blueprint Could Impact Your Clients

The new reporting requirements on brokers are addressed in Section 80603 of the bill. “Broker,” by definition in Sec. 6045 (c)(1), is expanded to include “any other person who (for a consideration) regularly acts as a middleman with respect to property or services…A person shall not be treated as a broker with respect to activities consisting of managing a farm on behalf of another person.” In turn, the bill defines a “digital asset” as “any digital representation of value which is recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger or any similar technology as specified by the Secretary.